EcoTech Radion Versus TMC Aqua Ray HO LED Aquarium Lights nanoxia deep silence 120mm ultra quiet pc fan 1300 rpm

Readers should note that nanoxia ncore retro keyboard it is PUR that determines light quality for photosynthetic life over just PAR which of course is still an important measurement of light photons. However the many cool eye catching graphs published all around the internet showing LED lighting PAR readings at various points under said light can be and are often very misleading since a PAR reading of 120 (as an example) could actually provide more PUR than a reading of 150 at the same depth!! Please read on as well as the references for more about the WHYS of PUR vs PAR.

So with the illness anxiety disorder icd 10 math, this brings down exhibit ONE to essentially 113 useful light energy PAR based using applying a 50% efficiency to the green/yellow spectrums (the actual efficiency is from 20% to 70%, so we are splitting social anxiety assessment pdf the numbers, meaning the light fixture could be more or even less efficient).


Meanwhile exhibit TWO is at 120 useful light energy PAR.

Another way to look at this is is that in air, the ecotech radion produces 600 mm of PAR @ 15 inches of air (480 water social anxiety disorder symptoms nhs). This comes to a PAR efficiency of .25 watt of input energy per 1 point of PAR (certainly not bad compared to many of the discount leds such as the SB reef LED which comes to an abysmal .41 watt input energy per point of PAR).

This is more a matter of opinion, but the edge here does go to the ecotech radion due to its ultraviolet, green anoxic brain injury wiki and red emitters. But this is clearly for us humans, NOT for the corals based on the known science of light energy. The ecotech radion pros may look "cool" (or "pop" as some would say) with their near UV emitters mixed with green and yellow emitters to balance them out, but everyone of these noted emitters is for human consumption, not corals.

As well the ultraviolet emitters used do not even register on a PAR emitter can anxiety attack cause diarrhea, while the green and yellow do, but give a false impression of useful light energy, which is part of the fallacy of relying heavily on PAR meters/readings as a determination of LED fixture quality (which PAR measurements can be VERY misleading when comparing one fixture hypoxic brain damage symptoms to another).

In my opinion and based on my 35 years in the professional aquarium keeping/design industry (45 in the hobby), the ecotech has simply done a top notch job of marketing their product so as to convince many forums that anything else other than an ecotech (or maybe an aqua illuminations) are simply junk! I can back this up with many making personal straw man attacks on me in forums sponsored anxiété définition psychologie by ecotech and simply dismissing aquarays as "junk".

The concepts we talk about in these article are provable by scientific facts. You may have not heard of current reduction (the electrical current reducing over distance), but it can happen depending on what type of electrical conductor is used. This idea can be found from many google searches such as, "electrical current reducing anoxia cerebral en el parto over distance".

More importantly, current reduction deals with a consent electrical current. It is very well know that if the voltage of these currents are reduced for an leds, it will shift the lighting spectrum of the LED. Possibly making colors that would not be the best for the coral difference between hypoxia and anoxia or plants growth and also cause algae. If the point of an LED is to have a quality hypoxic brain damage prognosis spectrum to make whatever we are growing thrive, wouldn’t it be counter productive to have a spectrum shift to who-knows-what? This is PWM versus consent current.

Why does nobody use the balling lite system, or even the triton method? I don’t see a lot on the triton method, that doesn’t mean it’s irrelevant. That’s why anoxia cerebral I enjoy my time on the european forums more than the US forums. Any way you slice it, the europeans and other countries have been keeping fish much longer than the united states folks. I surely won’t dismiss anyones methods etc, but I think the bottom line is they have more experience in the fishkeeping hobby. (by several hundreds years at least)