Breathtaking news from the Pentagon about Afghanistan – Fabius Maximus website que es la anoxia cerebral

Summary: my writings began in 2003 with analysis of the pentagon’s obviously false reports about victory in afghanistan. Fifteen years later, william lind shows that little has changed. Anger is the only rational response by a free people to this. Our response will reveal, again, what we have become. ID 72674406 © štěpán kápl | dreamstime. The pentagon declares bankruptcy by william S. Lind at traditional right, 7 january 2019.

According to the december 28 new york times, the pentagon has finally made its moral and intellectual bankruptcy official. With regard to our failed war in afghanistan, the times reported that the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, general joseph F. Dunford jr. (USMC), said that the taliban “are not losing.” the general is correct. The nanoxia deep silence 120mm ultra quiet pc fan 1300 rpm taliban are not losing because they have won. All that remains is working out the details of their assumption of power and our hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy life expectancy departure. To his credit, president trump recognizes that reality.

Wow. I doubt moltke jr. Or even keitel, whom the fuehrer described as having the mind of a hotel doorman, sank that low. Has general dunford considered asking the charwoman who cleans his office? Perhaps he could talk to his milkman or egg lady. Certainly his driver should be consulted; after all he has some idea where he is going, which general dunford, after sixteen years of war and several thousand american dead, admittedly does not. In the long annals of military incompetence that’s still one for the history books. Clio should award general dunford the golden trash can, first class, with oak leaves, swords and diamonds.

Let us imagine, for a moment, that we are a prussian officer sent to advise general dunford on how to turn a lost war around (that’s what happens when you fart at the dinner table on board the hohenzollern). Taking the general’s statement quoted above as a description of his strategy, we see that “supporting the afghans” has no meaning because it is a war of afghans against afghans. As to “putting pressure on the terrorist groups”, “terrorists” simply means “the other side” and “pressure” means tactical pinpricks with no strategic impact. It is seldom possible to reverse strategic failure at the tactical level, and kleckern, nicht klotzen is a prescription for failure at all levels of war.

So to begin anxiety neurosis meaning in hindi we need to shift our focus to a strategic level. I suspect even general dunford knows that the taliban’s strategic center of gravity is its support by pakistan. Take that away, and the taliban is walking on air. How might that be done? Recognize that so long as the current afghan government is aligned with india, pakistan has no choice but to support the taliban. Pakistan’s threat is india, and pakistan needs afghanistan as an ally to offer it some strategic depth. Above all, it cannot have a hostile anxiety meaning in gujarati afghanistan putting pakistan in a two-front situation. So our first step is to give the current afghan government a (secret, not public) ultimatum: cut all ties to india and become a loyal and subservient ally of pakistan. If they won’t, our troops and money go home. The money, more than the troops, will concentrate their thinking.

When the taliban sees this move and realizes the strategic threat it represents, offer them a peace that secures our limited objective while rewarding them. Our objective going into afghanistan was to deprive al qaeda of a base. We have no quarrel with the taliban per se. So, we offer to recognize a taliban-led afghanistan as long as they do not invite back groups that seek to attack the american homeland. Al qaeda have worn out its welcome in afghanistan before 9/11 and it now has more useful bases in other countries. Plus, the taliban is already fighting ISIS within afghanistan. As part of a peace deal, we could offer to support the taliban in that fight, not with troops but with the all-important ammunition in 4GW, money.

I doubt general dunford will be willing to heed prussian advice. But if he’s asking the whole world for input, he might recall that these services send their best and brightest young officers to serve anxiety disorder meaning in telugu the members of the joint chiefs of staff. As chairman, he is well within his rights to say to those young officers, many who will have served in afghanistan, what he said on the post’s panel: if you’ve got better ideas than what we are now doing, please share them with me. I suspect he would to get some useful feedback, perhaps along the lines I’ve outlined here.

William S. Lind is director of the american conservative center for public transportation. He has a master’s degree in history from princeton university in 1971. He worked as a legislative aide for armed services for senator robert taft, jr., of ohio from 1973 to 1976 and held a similar position with senator gary hart of colorado from 1977 to 1986. See his bio at wikipedia.

“why anoxie, since the end of world war II, has the united states either lost every war it started or failed in every military intervention it prosecuted? Harlan ullman’s new book answers this most disturbing question, a question americans would never think of even asking because this record of failure has been largely hidden in plain sight or forgotten with the passage of time.

“making this case is an in-depth analysis of the records of presidents from john F. Kennedy to barack obama and donald trump in using force or starting wars. His recommended solutions begin with a “brains-based” approach to sound strategic thinking to address onne of the major causes of failure —-the inexperience of too many of the nation’s commanders-in-chief. Ullman reinforces his argument through the use of autobiographical vignettes that provide a human dimension and insight into the reasons for failure, in some cases making public previously unknown history.

The inept, military-dominated, cruel, and generally unpleasant governments currently running both countries LIKE the current situation want to keep it in place, and have far too many ways to thwart your vision. We learned a long time ago that barring extremely unusual circumstances, like losing WWII, foreigners coming in and imposing reflex anoxic seizures in infants their vision of a perfect government is an unavoidable recipe for total disaster for the interfering international powers.

Experience has shown that the usual outcome of such an attempt is that the US would pour more billions of dollars and thousands of lives into the effort and would unify the population of both countries against anything we suggest and make the general population much more receptive to supporting the terrorists and the so-called governments simply because they are NOT viewed as foreign invaders.

My final thought on this idea just makes things worse. Pakistan, like it or not, is a nuclear-armed nation. How do you feel about the pakistani government using nuclear weapons on either the US or their own people? I cannot, in moderate language, describe how unhappy I am about the thought of ripping the lid off that particular can of incestuous, blood-sucking, demonic tapeworms. The resulting catastrophic consequences anxiété définition COULD NOT POSSIBLY be worth the theoretical but highly unlikely benefits.